Prince Philip: monarchies today and what his life has meant for the British monarchy (Part II)

127
Buckingham Palace Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip host President and Mrs. Kennedy in 1961. Prince Philip came for the funeral of President Kennedy and when Mrs Kennedy searched for her son she found Prince Philip taking care of and playing with him. He understood loss at an early age. Photo credit: U. S. Department of State photograph in the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston. Public Domain, via Wkimedia Commons.

IO – On the 2nd of June 1953 my late mother was in London covering Queen Elizabeth II’s coronation. She was contributing cultural editor of the Rhein-Zeitung and I have in a way followed in her footsteps. Just 8 years after the Second World War there was still a lot of anti-German feeling in Britain. I wonder if she was nervous but an uncle of hers had been the cor­respondent in London for one of the German newspapers before the War and had loved the United Kingdom with nothing but good to say about the British. So, perhaps she was not ner­vous. All she told me was that there were such masses of crowds that she would have been unable to see any­thing except that she was on the up­per deck of one of those famous red, London double-decker buses and so had a better view than nearly anyone else. Nearly 70 years later as I write about the death of Prince Philip from Jakarta, I wish that I had asked her more about that coronation and her experience and thoughts as a young German journalist not long after the War covering a coronation that Clement Attlee announced with the words, “Let us hope we are witnessing the be­ginning of a new Elizabethan Age no less renowned than the first.” In reali­ty the Queen and Prince Philip’s main job proved to be that of presiding over the dissolution and dismantling of an empire with grace and dignity, keep­ing Britain united and trying to help their people weather the enormous changes confronting them.

William Daniel, a long time British resident of Jakarta whose Uncle Bill was in the royal navy with Prince Phil­ip, recently found some of his uncle’s letters from that period describing how during shore leave in places like Biarritz they would go down in shore parties to party and Prince Philip re­marking, “God, we shall have to dance with the old ladies first. Then hopeful­ly the younger ones.”

“It was young men’s talk,” William says, “but for me it was very touching because by 1951 my uncle had died of polio.”

For Daniel the royal family rep­resent an example of nominally privi­leged people who devote their lives and effort to serving their country and peo­ple responsibly, warmly and very well. Nevertheless, some question whether a constitutional monarchy is still an acceptable and valuable system of government in the 21st century? And if yes, why and what does it contribute to a society?

HRH The Duke of Edinburgh and HRH Princess Anne with a koala, Brisbane, April 1970. Queen Elizabeth II, the Duke of Edinburgh, the Prince of Wales and the Princess Anne made an extensive tour of Australia in 1970 in connection with the bi-centenary of Captain James Cook sailing up the east coast of Australia in 1770

Kevin Evans another long-time Commonwealth resident of Jakarta from Australia this time, claims to be a rabid republican who finds it offen­sive that “we have these Pommies as head of state” but says that something weird happened to him that shows that the monarch perhaps means more to him than republicans like to admit. “About 15 years ago I was at the Australian Embassy at a light hearted sort of event. We all knew each other when suddenly I found myself go respectful, polite and quiet. I looked up to see what had caught my eye and it was the picture of an old lady, the Queen and I remember thinking that this old lady from that evil colonialist country can still do this to me. She is the only monarch I’ve ever known and there is a kind of permanence about her, something that has always been there…”

Uniting the nation is one of the primary functions of a head of state as opposed to a head of government. Germany’s Bundespraesident for example is a head of state but not the head of government. However, that position may only be held for 5 years and at most for two consecu­tive terms. Consequently, a Bunde­spraesident cannot give the sort of stability and seamless continuity that seventy-three years of monarchy can as is the case with Queen Eliza­beth II. At most a Bundespraesident can provide ten years of stability and continuity. That sort of continuity and unifying force in society is some­thing that could be very important at a time when countries such as the United States are experiencing great polarization within their societies.

For a monarchy to be success­ful however depends very much on the character and personality of the monarch and that of his or her con­sort. As the Oxford historian Peter Carey put it, “Monarchies are like Russian roulette”.

There is certainly an element of luck involved as the character and personality of a monarch as well as his or her ability to please the public is in large part in God’s hands. Per­haps a way of lessening the “Russian roulette” aspect of monarchy might be by infusing a further element of de­mocracy into the traditions of consti­tutional monarchy by not automati­cally having the oldest heir as the next monarch but by having parliament or a royal commission decide which of the monarch’s children is best suit­ed to succeed as the next in line. In Thailand where apparently the Princess Royal is far more popular and many believe would have been better suited to succeed King Bhumibol than the present Thai King, such a system might have helped to better ensure the stability and unity of the nation. Mon­archies such as the Netherlands and Sweden have taken a step forward by decreeing that the next in line to the throne is no longer the oldest male heir but simply the oldest child. The current Sultan of Jogjakarta appears determined to proceed in that direc­tion as well which in an age of gender equality is no bad thing.

Members of the House of Lords observe a minute’s silence before tributes to HRH The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, on 12 April 2021. Photo credit: Copyright House of Lords 2021 / Photography by Roger Harris

A constitutional monarchy de­pends very much on the will of the people in order to survive. The peo­ple must like the sovereign and see him or her as a unifying and stabiliz­ing figurehead. So, the personality of the monarch is very significant. It is a position that requires discipline, dedication, diplomacy, dignity and an ability to communicate that to the people. William Daniel makes clear that role of the Queen and Prince Philip when he says, “They were abso­lutely a unifying force especially now with many threats to the union. Brex­it put a lot of pressure on the union and the royal family are responsible for unifying the United Kingdom.”

In describing Australians’ feelings about the monarchy Kevin Evans re­marks, “About a third of the Austra­lian public are monarchists. The rest are not. Nevertheless, many Australians like the royal family. What many do not realize is that we can become a republic but still keep our connection to the royal family because we would still be a member of the Common­wealth. There is a feeling amongst Australians that if it’s not broken what are you fixing? The monarchy is quite functional so would some­thing new be better? If it does not get into the role of politics and remains a symbol of unity, I personally like and respect the monarchy.”

Another republican is the Oxford historian and Diponegoro expert Pe­ter Carey who says, “I am registered as British but here in Indonesia I ad­mire the radicalism of the Indonesian nationalist movement as expressed in three initiatives namely, despite Indonesia’s constitutional precedents being constitutional the nationalists chose to found a republic. Secondly, their decision not to use Java­nese – which was shot-through with feudal mentality – as the national lan­guage despite being the language of the majority and finally, the decision not to choose Islam as the religion of the state but rather to have the Pan­casila.

So, I look at Britain through the eyes of an Indonesian and see a state which as Adlai Stevenson said has lost an empire but not found a role. It’s plain that Britain is part of Europe and by leaving Europe it has signed its death warrant as 67% of Scotland and 57% of Northern Ire­land voted to remain in the Europe­an Union.

Prince Philip as Colonel-in-Chief of the Royal Canadian Regiment in Toronto, 17 April 2013. Photo Credit: Jamie McCaffrey, CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons .org/licenses/by/2.0), via Wikimedia Commons

Britain is a country that was un­able to decolonize its mind as Brex­it has shown. The monarchy could have been part of Britain’s solution but it missed two important oppor­tunities to embrace change namely in dealing firstly, with Princess Diana who brought popularity and moder­nity and a certain down-to-earth quality to the monarchy. Secondly, in how the palace dealt with Meghan Markle for bringing someone non-white into the royal family was an opportunity to show the monarchy as being multi-ethnic and inclusive for a large number of people in Brit­ain and the Commonwealth are non-white. The monarchy will continue but unless Britain and the monarchy can better embrace change I see it becoming a fossil in which case from my point of view what Indonesia did during the 20th century would be a better modal to emulate.”

As a historian Dr Carey is inter­ested in what the role of Prince Philip has been in the survival of the mon­archy from a historical perspective. Did he play a weak hand as power­fully as he could or less so later? Was he a wild card in the sense of being too patronizing or outspoken and non-politically correct?”

At the beginning of Queen Eliza­beth II’s reign the Queen Mother saw Prince Philip as a possible threat to the stability of the monarchy identi­fying him with Edward VIII. He has been described as “a prince from no­where with all those loose European connections”.

HRH Prince Philip taken at Buckingham Palace in 1992. Photo Credit: Allan warren, CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons .org/licenses/by-sa/3.0), via Wikimedia Commons

The problem with many pres­ent-day non-royal spouses is that they do not really understand the importance of preserving the mon­archy from a dynastical perspective. Prince Philip however, came from a very monarchical tradition himself and through his own history under­stood all too well how important it is to please the people and how devas­tating the loss of a throne is.

Despite his colourful past and all his strangeness to a very British Queen Mother and the traditionalist in the establishment, Prince Phil­ip proved to be absolutely the right partner for the Princess Elizabeth.

 One who was able to support her in creating that stable family image so helpful in providing a unifying con­tinuity as the country went through the painful process of decoloniza­tion and slowly shifting away from its role of once ruling the waves as one of the most powerful nations in the world. Prince Philip also helped the monarchy to adjust to 20th and 21st century modernity with his deep interest in science, engineering and design and he insisted on the royal family welcoming in an age of media and television.

Like many William Daniel sees the roles of Prince Philip and Queen Elizabeth II as having many good parallels with those of Queen Victo­ria and her consort Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha; the main differ­ence being that Albert died somewhat early. Despite many similarities Peter Carey points out a significant differ­ence namely, “Unlike Prince Philip, Prince Albert had certain political and constitutional powers. He could through persuasion or even forceful­ly, interfere with foreign policy. For example, Prince Albert tried to pre­vent Britain from arming the Confed­eracy during the American Civil War at a time when given British interests in cotton there were economic argu­ments for Britain to support the Con­federacy. Nevertheless, Prince Albert saw that British interests in the long term would not be served by taking sides in the Civil War.”

In sharp contrast with the Ha­noverian kings who ruled before her, part of the legacy of Queen Victoria is the idea of the monarchy provid­ing stability, unity and continuity through a modal family life and it was with her that monarchy came to be seen as the nation’s family.

Coat of Arms of Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (Knight of the Thistle) Photo credits: Sodacan, CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons .org/licenses/by-sa/4.0), via Wikimedia Commons

Prince Philip has described him­self as Pan-European and at the start of his marriage to Queen Elizabeth others described him as somewhat leftist, two qualities that probably stood him and the Queen in good stead when she ascended the throne in an era of the strengthening of the welfare state and the advent of global­ism. Prince Philip also had far more experience with the world outside the royal family then his very sheltered wife who aside from a brief stint in the women’s Territorial Auxiliary Service during the Second World War had never been to university or even school with other people her age and had very little experience of life not as a royal when she became queen.

For Philip it was also the right marriage. His marriage to Queen Elizabeth finally provided that lonely little boy who was moved from one place to another all his young life, with a loving family life and a stable and meaningful place in the world.

Willaim Daniel expresses a sad­ness tinged with apprehension felt by many when he says, “The inevitable demise of Prince Philip was poignant because of the fear of what may happen to the United Kingdom in due course. It is painful to contemplate and adds fuel to people’s reaction to the Prince’s death.” (Tamalia Alisjahbana)

A memorial and prayer for Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. Photo credit: Herry Lawford from Stockbridge, UK, CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons .org/licenses/by/2.0), via Wikimedia Commons

If you enjoyed this article you may want to read Part I of the series: https://observerid.com/prince-philip-monarchies-today-and-what-his-life-has-meant-for-the-british-monarchy-part-i-2/